RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00888
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be
corrected in Item 23, Authority and Reason, to remove AFI 36-
3209, Paragraph 3.22: discharge in the interest of national
security, SPD: JDK.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has a copy of his three credit reports and his criminal
history whose contents should not stop him from being in the
military.
In support of his request, but not listed on his DD Form 149,
the applicant submits copies of his NGB 22, documents pertaining
to his discharge, and copies of his credit reports from,
Experian, Transunion, and Equifax.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Georgia Air National Guard on
12 August 2008 and was separated from service on 27 April 2012.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
1. NGB/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states ANGI 36-2002,
Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a
Reserve of the Air Force, Table 4.4. Rule 19 notes, members who
receive a 6U RE code will be ineligible for reenlistment. The
JDK SPD code identifies the applicant was separated for
security reasons such as an inability to obtain a security
clearance due to financial concerns. AFI 36-3209, Separation
and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force
Reserve Members, section 3.22 states, when a member is unable to
obtain the level of clearance for an assignment or projected
duty assignment the characterization of service will be general,
under honorable condition.
The complete NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
NGB/A1P states they concur with the NGB/A1PP advisory.
The complete NGB/A1P evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 31 March 2013 for review and comment within 30
days. To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 5 November 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 15 February 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 4 March 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1P, dated 8 March 2013.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 March 2013.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01043
The MDANG was aware of her medical issues as well as her request to medically separate. As noted by the BCMR Medical Consultant, in order for the applicant to receive a medical discharge, there must be a medical condition that precluded retention: the evidence of record does not support that this is the case. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 11 February 2014, she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01006
In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, Table 1.5, Rule 2 "prior service members will enlist for 3 or 6 years." As noted on the DD Form 4/2 when enlisting in the COANG, the applicant signed a 4 year, 6 months, 10 days military service contract. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00685
On 3 Aug 10, the Vice Chief of Joint Staff signed an order amending the applicants separation from the ANG and transfer to the Air Force Reserve to reflect his discharge from the WYANG and as a Reserve of the Air Force effective 10 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 2.25.2, ANG Unique Separations. In addition, no one had the authority to discharge the applicant from the Reserve of the Air Force (See SAF/IG Report at Exhibit B). According to AFI 36-3209, the authority to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00677
ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, states in cases of contractual errors, the Force Support Squadron (FSS) will process a case file to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) outlining the facts of the situation, along with the individual airmans desire, the commanders recommendation and the FSS comments and recommendation; and that the airman may petition the Board if they do not agree with the final decision. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00655
By letter dated 28 Jan 13, the applicants commander states that due to an administrative oversight the applicant signed a three year reenlistment contract; however, he should have been given the opportunity extend his enlistment for six years. Until such time as he has exhausted all available administrative remedies, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief requested. Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Mar 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00641
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00641 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reason for separation (Erroneous Enlistment (Medical Conditions)) along with the corresponding Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of J95 be changed; and that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) status of Ineligible be changed to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00592
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 6H (Pending Discharge - Involuntary) be corrected. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant's military personnel records, he initially entered the Air National Guard on 4 Aug 11. Therefore, we recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03670
Members may be discharged when the member has accumulated nine or more unexcused absences from UTA within a 12-month period. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 November 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05006
According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 20 Jun 13, the applicant requested removal of the contested OPR to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); however, her request was denied. Based on our review of the applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the contested report is not a true and accurate assessment of her performance and demonstrated potential during the specified time period or that the comments contained in the report...